chore: ruff auto-fix PLR6201 resweep — tuple → set in membership tests (#27355)
Six days after #23937 (608 fixes) the codebase had accumulated 241 new PLR6201 violations. Same mechanical `x in (...)` → `x in {...}` fix, same zero-risk profile: set lookup is O(1) vs O(n) for tuple and the two are semantically equivalent for hashable scalar membership tests. All 241 instances fixed via `ruff check --select PLR6201 --fix --unsafe-fixes`, zero remaining. Every changed value is a hashable scalar (str/int/None/enum/signal); no risk of unhashable runtime errors. No behavior change. Test plan: - 119 files changed, +244/-244 (net zero) — exactly one-line edits - `ruff check` clean afterward - Compile checks pass on the largest touched files (cli.py, run_agent.py, gateway/run.py, gateway/platforms/discord.py, model_tools.py) - Subset broad test run on tests/gateway/ tests/hermes_cli/ tests/agent/ tests/tools/: 18187 passed, 59 pre-existing failures (verified against origin/main with the same shape — identical failure count, identical category — all xdist test-order flakes unrelated to this change) Follows the same template as PR #23937 ([tracker: #23972](https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/23972)).
This commit is contained in:
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ class TestKillStaleDashboardPosix:
|
||||
sent.append((pid, sig))
|
||||
# Simulate stubborn process: probe (sig 0) always succeeds,
|
||||
# SIGTERM does nothing, SIGKILL is where it "dies".
|
||||
if sig in (_signal.SIGTERM, 0, _signal.SIGKILL):
|
||||
if sig in {_signal.SIGTERM, 0, _signal.SIGKILL}:
|
||||
return
|
||||
# Any other signal — also fine.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user